STUDYING FOREIGN LANGUAGES
Traditionally, children have begun studying foreign languages at secondary school,
but introducing them earlier is recommended by some educationalists. This policy
has been adopted by some educational authorities or individual schools, with both
positive and negative outcomes.
The obvious argument in its favour is that young children pick up languages much
more easily than teenagers. Their brains are still programmed to acquire their mother
tongue, which facilitates learning another language, and unlike adolescents, they are
not inhibited by self-consciousness.
The greater flexibility of the primary timetable allows for more frequent, shorter
sessions and for a play-centred approach, thus maintaining learners’ enthusiasm and
progress. Their command of the language in later life will benefit from this early
exposure, while learning other languages subsequently will be easier for them. They
may also gain a better understanding of other cultures.
There are, however, some disadvantages. Primary school teachers are generalists, and
may not have the necessary language skills themselves. If specialists have to be
brought in to driver these sessions, the flexibility referred to above is diminished.
If primary language teaching is not standardized, secondary schools could be faced
with a great variety of levels in different languages within their intakes, resulting
in a classroom experience which undoes the earlier gains. There is no advantage if
enthusiastic primary pupils become demotivated as soon as they change schools. However,
these issues can be addressed strategically within the policy adopted.
Anything which encourages language learning benefits society culturally and economically,
and early exposure to language learning contributes to this. Young children’s innate
abilities should be harnessed to make these benefits more achievable.
but introducing them earlier is recommended by some educationalists. This policy
has been adopted by some educational authorities or individual schools, with both
positive and negative outcomes.
The obvious argument in its favour is that young children pick up languages much
more easily than teenagers. Their brains are still programmed to acquire their mother
tongue, which facilitates learning another language, and unlike adolescents, they are
not inhibited by self-consciousness.
The greater flexibility of the primary timetable allows for more frequent, shorter
sessions and for a play-centred approach, thus maintaining learners’ enthusiasm and
progress. Their command of the language in later life will benefit from this early
exposure, while learning other languages subsequently will be easier for them. They
may also gain a better understanding of other cultures.
There are, however, some disadvantages. Primary school teachers are generalists, and
may not have the necessary language skills themselves. If specialists have to be
brought in to driver these sessions, the flexibility referred to above is diminished.
If primary language teaching is not standardized, secondary schools could be faced
with a great variety of levels in different languages within their intakes, resulting
in a classroom experience which undoes the earlier gains. There is no advantage if
enthusiastic primary pupils become demotivated as soon as they change schools. However,
these issues can be addressed strategically within the policy adopted.
Anything which encourages language learning benefits society culturally and economically,
and early exposure to language learning contributes to this. Young children’s innate
abilities should be harnessed to make these benefits more achievable.
下一篇:第32章戒烟其实很简单
声明:以上文章均为用户自行添加,仅供打字交流使用,不代表本站观点,本站不承担任何法律责任,特此声明!如果有侵犯到您的权利,请及时联系我们删除。
文章熱度:☆☆☆☆☆
文章難度:☆☆☆☆☆
文章質量:☆☆☆☆☆
說明:系統根據文章的熱度、難度、質量自動認證,已認證的文章將參與打字排名!
本文打字排名TOP20
登录后可见